Being slightly older than the age he was playing, Coulson brought a maturity to the part which made Riddle seem wiser than years. The second was Christian Coulson as Tom Riddle, who nailed capturing the essence of the character and was a convincing villain onscreen. Branagh knew exactly what buttons to press for hamming up his performance as Lockhart and stole almost every scene. Casting a Shakespearan in such an absurd role was a genius move. One was Sir Kenneth Branagh as Gilderoy Lockhart, the new Defence Against the Dark Arts professor. In terms of the overall cast, there were two standouts. The acting from the main three kids also develops, although still a work in progress. It does improve upon its predecessor by having a more mature plot, darker elements and a compelling focus on the Harry-Ron friendship.
![all harry potter movies ranked on enjoyability all harry potter movies ranked on enjoyability](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81Q4NU+RqOL.jpg)
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) Warner BrosĪlthough Chamber of Secrets is a sentimental favourite for this writer, it is not the strongest Harry Potter film. While this is objectively not a ‘bad’ film, many of the others in the franchise are much better. Several key players across the franchise – McGonagall, the Weasley family, Neville, Lupin and more only play small roles, which is a tough blow considering this is the penultimate appearance for all the characters, even Harry himself. Mundungus Fletcher (Andy Linden) was an effective comedic character for the brief time he appeared. Dobby the House Elf’s return following four-film absence was welcome, as was the addition of Bill Nighy as new Minister for Magic, Rufus Scrimgeour. Some moments do save the film, to an extent. While the decision to split the film makes sense from a practical standpoint, this half lacks the excitement of its successor. In all honesty, the main purpose of Part 1 is to establish plot elements that will pay off in Part 2. The film started off strong and action-packed but the story overall is almost forgettable. Whether or not this was successful is up to individual interpretation.
#All harry potter movies ranked on enjoyability full#
In order to maximise the story to its full potential, the final Harry Potter film, Deathly Hallows, was split into two parts released in 20. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 1 (2010) Warner Bros Unlike the darker stories later in the series, Columbus’ films are geared towards a family audience and thus are more over-the-top sweet and sentimental. Doubtfire and more) made him suitable to direct a large group of children, his contribution to the franchise stands out significantly. Although Chris Columbus’ past work ( Home Alone, Mrs. Lastly, there is the overall tone of Philosopher’s Stone – please ignore the very deliberate attempt at a rhyme. Many of the later films remedy this problem by adding original components specifically for the screen. Therefore, the film’s plot plays out very predictably. Columbus and screenwriter Steve Kloves were not very imaginative in reinvigorating JK Rowling’s original story. “What are you talking about?” I hear you ask, “Is that not a good thing?” Surprisingly, it actually isn’t.
![all harry potter movies ranked on enjoyability all harry potter movies ranked on enjoyability](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QsLt2eeFdAqe5gbHKRmvei-480-80.jpg)
This is painfully obvious when rewatching the franchise and takes away some of the enjoyment for the overall film.įurthermore, Philosopher’s Stone is an almost shot-by-shot representation of what happened in the book. Much of the first outing was dedicated to exposition to introduce Harry (and therefore the viewer) to the Wizarding World. Harry Potter and The Philosopher’s Stone (2001) Warner Brosįirst is not always best, as the Harry Potter franchise proved. So, without further ado, here is Courageous Nerd‘s ranking of all eight Harry Potter films, as released by Warner Bros. The individual directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso Cuarón, Mike Newell and David Yates) also made very different movies and some captured the magic of Hogwarts and the Wizarding World better than others. Many of the situations or characters are unique to a specific film, which will influence the ranking. The remaining films were released in 2002, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2009, 20, concluding Harry’s story arc.Īlthough centered on the same character and a portion of the larger overall story, each of the films are very different. The first film, Harry Potter and The Philosopher’s Stone (or Sorcerer’s Stone, depending where you are) came out in 2001, just five years after JK Rowling’s novel was published. They also saw Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson, who played Harry, Ron and Hermione grow from children to young adults.
![all harry potter movies ranked on enjoyability all harry potter movies ranked on enjoyability](https://images.saymedia-content.com/.image/t_share/MTc1MDg5OTY0NDcwNTEwNjg3/harry-potter-movies-ranked-best-to-worst.jpg)
Over the course of a decade, fans around the world experienced the Wizarding World through the eyes of Harry Potter, the Boy Who Lived. Here is our official ranking of all the films from eighth place down to first. Released between 2001-2011, the Harry Potter films are a staple of modern pop culture.